Problems with the PIC18F25K22

Aresby · Post by **Aresby** » Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:05 pm

Senacharim wrote:Read thru the revised wiki entry, I find nothing particularly objectionable nor in need of large amounts of clarification.

Thanks for the endorsement.

This stuff is not easy! My next project only requires the absolute simplest of chips so I'm reverting (temporarily) back to a PICAXE solution, not least because I have some chips and a proto-board on which to mount it!

But SF and the 18K series is my preferred platform of choice, without a doubt.

Aresby · Post by **Aresby** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:12 am

I updated the article with a reference to David's article about ensuring all internal clock code runs before any initialisation code in other "include" files.

Other than that it seems that it is a completed article.

Thanks to everyone for taking the time and trouble to act as proof-readers and technical consultants.