A new IDE for Swordfish Basic

bluex · Post by **bluex** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:35 am

Swordfish editor is great. I not see what you put plus in your editor. are you going to make a visual studio?

Sung

octal · Post by **octal** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:15 pm

bluex wrote:Swordfish editor is great.

Sung

I agree fully with you.

bluex wrote:are you going to make a visual studio?

Sung

may be.

Thanks !

octal

Moby · Post by **Moby** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:44 pm

The one thing that springs to mind is some form of version control and maybe extended project management.

Edit: Alright, the two things that spring to mind.....

octal · Post by **octal** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:58 pm

This was planned but now all the project is in standbay. If (maybe) I continue developments, I'll perhaps add such features.

Thanks for suggestions.

Regards

octal

gem1144aaa · Post by **gem1144aaa** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 3:22 pm

hi

If and only if you add an < RTOS > to Swordfish Basic then You Seek perfectness

RadioT · Post by **RadioT** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:43 pm

Wouldn't the amount of work to build and verify a new IDE be comparable to extending SF to higher series of chips? If so, that is where I would like to see the effort.

Speaking as an entrepreneur, I would think adding an additional SF version or extension for the 24F or higher series would increase sales of the product much more that a revamped 18F IDE. I would think David could make a better return from his efforts and investment by adding a whole new audience of users than just adding another choice for 18F users.

How many new users would switch to SF with a new IDE anyway? 18F series has a core group of users but they tend to stick with what tools they know and there's a lot more users using the higher series or switching to the higher series. I see that Microchip is proposing to buy Atmel, perhaps we'll see Microchip cores in Atmel chips. That could be a whole new opportunity for SF as well.

A new IDE for Swordfish Basic

Do you need a new IDE for Swordfish Basic ?