Swordfish

Gentlemen, I would try copying the SE IDE over to the full version... Yes, I did not want to do that! At that point, my troubleshooting ended and my post began.... Minds greater than mine being needed.... If the summary window is what appears at the bottom of the IDE then what I am trying to say is ...

I have a minor problem with the IDE screen. After a successful compilation, the screen jumps, but the final line that summarizes the results at the bottom of the IDE page never appears. I also have a version of Swordfish SE and, of course, the IDE works just fine with SE. I have looked in the progra...

HI JERRY, Yes we are getting good results. Due to your guidance. Left on my own, I would be going in circles of ever increasing radii. I do very much appreciate your help! I had tried the shift instruction as Z = Z >> 3 TAKE Z SHIFT IT 3 X RIGHT AND STICK IT BACK INTO Z (KIND OF LIKE IN C) BUT I GOT...

THE CODE MAY BE READY FOR A TEST DRIVE (OF THE BETA KIND)...... THE PROGRAMMING INTERFACE PINS 2, 3, & 4 ARE USED FOR POWER AND SERIAL OUT AT 19200 8N&1. THE OUTPUT I GOT FROM MY BOARD IS AS FOLLOWS (SOME ADDRESSES REMOVED TO MAKE IT MORE COMPACT): ---------------------------------------------------...

Hi jerry I am confused about the shift instructions. addr = addr>>3 is this statement okay in SF. shift addr right 3x A statement like addr = addr>>3 seemed to give compile errors when I tried it. Your if I2C.IsPresent(addr << 1) then compiles fine..... You may have fixed another mistake I have been...

Hi Jerry The reason I started messing with the scanner was because I was having trouble with an I2C INA219 I/V/P MONITORING DEVICE. It would free a pin now used as an analog port to an INA240 HI SIDE ANALOG CURRENT MONITOR. Applying this device has really grown into something I never expected. The i...

It works! But, it behaves as if it were in an infinite loop, ignoring the for-next. I noticed the continuous operation when I used 8 bit addresses while trouble shooting... Here are the results (for a scan from $80 to $FE) and code I added to escape from the tendency for infinite repetition .... Sca...

I was wondering why the address range was from 0 to 126 as I have used the I2C successfully in the past and always shifted left for the read / write bit, (that's what happens to a copy cat). I had tried the 128 to 254 loop and got a "hit" on every address. I suspected that zero might represent a "sp...

I'm back again. I am trying to scan for I2C devices using the function"IsPresent(addr)" from the I2C module. Looking at the "IsPresent(addr)"it seems to do the exact function of verifying that an I2C device exists in the pic's hardware @ addr. I have had limited success in that the code does detect ...

Hello Bitfogav Bitfogav, please no need to be apologize for anything... If I had used the processor you specified, it would have worked great. I tend to use the k22 series because I've had relatively good luck with them. I very much appreciate your willingness to share your work, as I am sure many o...

THANKS Jerry! I spent some time this past weekend trying to trouble shoot the problem. Even looked at the data pin to make sure it wasn't somehow shorted to ground - nope 10k to Vdd. I did notice the last "public" function in the i2c module " IsPresent(addrs) " and tried it as well. All of the code ...

Hello LEEDNH here again ... I thought that I would try out the i2c scanner by bitfogav. The program is a great idea in so far as, if the i2c device isn't found by the scanner, one could rest well assured that sending or receiving data to the device would be a fool's errand... What I did: copied the ...

Hi Jerry I kind of just fell into using the k22 pics (usually the 2xK22) but also the smaller 14K22 when fewer pins are needed. Thanks very much for the "HEADS UP" as I follow the tried and true engineering maxim regarding the reading of manuals - only after all other options have been exhausted.. J...

Jerry
An update on the SUART... After several hours of back and forth at 19200 the version 1.6 SUART works GREAT!!

Downloaded the Hardware-assisted software uart! Placed them in the library - now we do have FULL DUPLEX!

I'll try to use the FDX next weekend...

Best regards
Lee

Hi Jerry I had a thought about 4 a.m., that I should isolate rx from tx by using a common array but separate FOR-NEXT loops for rx and tx as in half duplex. New code shown below. TNX FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!!! WORKS GREAT!! I guess it could be called looping data the hard way.... "GET 88 BYTES - NO PIANO ...