Search found 1473 matches
- Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:34 am
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: Has anyone used Peripheral Pin Select to map pins?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6901
Well Garry, at least you got over the first hurdle and got it to compile. What I can't figure out is how does the USART2 module know which pins to use....The program would not compile using the native USART2 module because it wanted to use PORTG I never came up with a good way of getting around this...
- Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:12 pm
- Forum: Modules
- Topic: PIC to PC Communications
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3410
- Sun Aug 14, 2011 5:33 pm
- Forum: User Modules
- Topic: User module selection
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3421
Graham, One thing you CAN do (and I don't know if this helps with what you're trying to do) is to include the subdirectory name in the 'include' statement. If you have: UserLibrary\test.bas UserLibrary\Sub Folder\test.bas then in your .bas file you can use the syntax: include "Sub Folder/test.bas" a...
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 6:15 pm
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: stack depth?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1954
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 1:22 pm
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: stack depth?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1954
stack depth?
I'd like to see how deep I'm nesting subroutine calls.
Does the compiler keep track of this? Is there any way of looking at/tracking stack usage?
Does the compiler keep track of this? Is there any way of looking at/tracking stack usage?
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 1:11 pm
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: (Official) support for new PICs ???
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7515
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:29 am
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: (Official) support for new PICs ???
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7515
That's strange... mine are straight from 8.73a with SystemConvert and I get different results. Here's a few comparisons (mine followed by the new tool's output): 13K50: #const _ram_banks = $01 // 1 RAM bank(s) used #variable _maxram = $0100 // 256 bytes of user RAM #const _eeprom = $0100 // 256 byte...
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:10 am
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: (Official) support for new PICs ???
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7515
I hate to go off-topic, but I just loaded the libs from the new device library installer and some of them don't match up very well with the current devices. While most of the differences are simply ADC/CCP stuff (which I never could figure out how in the world you got right to begin with), a number ...
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:48 am
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: (Official) support for new PICs ???
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7515
Whatever you come up with, PLEASE don't have the IDE touch anything in the libraries without warning me... and NEVER touch my user libraries. While I understand the desire to try and keep the libs updated, if they change then when/if I rebuild something I'd have to go back and retest the entire proj...
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:20 pm
- Forum: Modules
- Topic: USART.read problem
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2170
- Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:25 pm
- Forum: IDE
- Topic: DS30 Compatible Loader
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6172
I would LOVE to find some nice, small, easy to use bootloader code I think it depends on your definition of small, and how you want to interface to it. For a serial port loader, DS30 is pretty reasonable. Most of the USB ones I've seen are much bigger. The MikroE StartUSB is about 6700 bytes, and t...
- Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:41 pm
- Forum: Compiler
- Topic: Need pointers on Ethernet with ENC28J60 or J600
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6790
I was never able to find all my old test files, but I did manage to find the original board I used, which was an eIP-10 ( http://www.ljcv.net/eip10/index.html ) This board has an 18F2620 and an ENC28J60. I just compiled David's ethernet library for it (the simple ping example) and pretty much the on...
- Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:11 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: 18f26k80 with PWM
- Replies: 15
- Views: 9625
- Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:32 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: 18f26k80 with PWM
- Replies: 15
- Views: 9625
I've never used that chip or the adc at 64MHz, but it sounds like the adc timing may not be setup properly. Are you calling 'SetConvTime(FOSC_64)' in your main code? If so, perhaps try a slower clock and see what happens. There is some errata for the K80 adc that suggests it's only good for 10 bits....
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:32 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: 18f26k80 with PWM
- Replies: 15
- Views: 9625
From what I can tell, it would appear that the compiler may not be generating the correct code for those upper registers on the 66K80 family of parts. It doesn't seem to be getting the upper ACCESS bank correct. Also, the device .bas file doesn't appear to be right, at least using the file SystemCon...